Atlanta Hawks

Tim Fuller – USA Today Sports Images The Atlanta Hawks are going to have an eventful summer, especially in regards to NBA Free Agency. That all starts because they have a great number of players that will become free agents this off-season. Because of that, they will have to do a lot of work and make a good deal of signings to build a quality team for next season. They will likely lose Josh Smith to unrestricted free agency and they are more than likely going to re-sign point guard Jeff Teague without thinking twice about it. However, it will be the other moves that require a little more though and will be a little more up for debate by the organization and the talking heads. One move that they should consider making is re-signing Kyle Korver. Korver had a nice year this past season for the Hawks. He played in 74 games during the regular season and played 30.5 minutes per game. He averaged 10.9 points, four rebounds, two assists and 0.9 steals per game while shooting 46.1 percent from the floor and a fantastic 45.7 percent from beyond-the-arc. There’s no question that Korver maintained his reputation as one of the best outside shooters in the league this year and also proved that, although he’s not great, that he’s a much improved defender and less of a liability in that regard. He has real value, especially to a team like the Hawks that are going to need to fill roles. They can always use an elite shooter and Korver undoubtedly fits that bill. Korver made $5 million last season and will likely make around the same amount of money next year, give or take. If that’s the price tag that the Hawks have to pay, that’s more than worth it to enlist Korver’s services. Korver has expressed interest in staying in Atlanta for the future and it seems like the right move for the organization would be to appease him. Cody Williams is a Senior Writer with Rant Sports. Follow Cody on Twitter @TheSizzle20 and like his Facebook page.

Larry Drew remains under contract with the Atlanta Hawks but the team is actively pursuing other candidates to fill the role next season. Atlanta Hawks general manager Danny Ferry met with the media on Saturday as part of the Hawks' exit process. During his talk, he discussed the status of his head coach Larry Drew and said that he would take some time before deciding whether to bring back Drew or begin a coaching search. "We're going to take some time, give it some distance, give it some space from the season, from the playoffs, from the emotions of that," Ferry said on the practice court at Philips Arena. "Then we'll make decisions that we feel are best in the short-term and long-term interests of the team." Ferry is expected to rebuild the Hawks from the ground up with a roster that essentially includes three players who are under contract for next season. That could include Drew with whom he inherited after taking over for Rick Sund last summer. Drew helped guide the Hawks to a 44-38 mark during the regular season and is 128-102 in three seasons with Atlanta. The Hawks have made the playoffs in all three seasons and upset the Orlando Magic in the first round in 2010. Atlanta has been ousted in the first round the last two seasons by the Boston Celtics and the Indiana Pacers. "I thought we had a really good season given what our circumstances were. They weren't the best," Drew said. "Whether I'm back here or not, I don't know. The one thing I will say is I've had a great run here."

Apr 16, 2013; Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta Hawks shooting guard John Jenkins (12) pulls up for a shot over Toronto Raptors shooting guard DeMar DeRozan (10) during the second half at Philips Arena. The Raptors won 113-96. Mandatory Credit: Paul Abell-USA TODAY Sports John Jenkins, AKA J-Lo, made a name for himself with Hawks fans around mid-March when he dropped four double digit scoring outputs in about two weeks of play. In case you’ve been under a rock for the entire season, here’s a little more information on John Logan Jenkins. Author’s Note: I know what you’re thinking, reader… “A rock?! Who does this Barnes guy think he is? I’ve already paid off my mortgage!” If that’s not the case, well, I hope you enjoy this anyway. Carry on. At the end of the 2011-2012 season, I was looking forward to the draft. As my first draft as an obsessed Hawks fan, I took it upon myself to do as much research as possible on every player that was projected to wiggle through David Stern’s lips when he says, “With the 23rd pick of the 2012 NBA Draft, the ‘Atlaynta Hahwks’ select ____________.” Naturally, I googled “NBA Mock Draft 2012″ and found myself jumping around several draft specific websites. After watching old games on my WatchESPN app, YouTube scouting reports, and workout videos, I was enamored with several players. Jeffrey Taylor, Tony Wroten Jr, Fab Melo, Jared Cunningham, Festus Ezeli, and many others made their way onto my iPad’s screen as I analyzed their games like I knew how to at the time: smile at pretty basketball. But then life threw me a curveball and the Hawks hired Danny Ferry. Should that have affected my scouting? Probably not, except for the fact that he traded away (my hero dream-killer) Joe Johnson and (my other hero) Marvin Williams (Who am I kidding? Even Utah is tired of Marvin already.) I was sent through a metaphorical loop and I had no clue who the Hawks would draft. Talk about a wild June, eh? On draft night, I sat on pins and needles (literally just kidding, I own a couch) as I anxiously awaited David Stern to call out the 23rd pick. My mind was all over the place. “Please Jeffrey Taylor. Please Jeffrey Taylor. Please Jeffrey Taylor,” I pleaded as the commish approached the podium. I loved his work at Vanderbilt and I thought he would fit in well after the recent acquisition of Lou Williams (who was I kidding?). “With the 23rd pick of the 2012 NBA Draft, the ‘Atlaynta Hahwks’ select John Jenkins from Vanderbilt.” My head was buried in my hands. “What did Ferry just do! Wait, who is this guy?” I realized that I had never heard of John Jenkins, much less “scouted” him. I had so many questions running through my head. “Is he good? Can he shoot (stupid question)? How did I not notice him in Vanderbilt games? Is he really a first-round pick?” If I remember right, Tom Penn of ESPN led off the Pick No. 23 “coverage” by mentioning how teams late in the first-round tend to lean toward specialists, from shooters to rim protectors to defensive specialists. Well, we certainly grabbed a specialist alright. And, as of right now, I couldn’t be happier. Now that we’re done with my attempt at creative writing, let’s dig into J-Lo’s game, shall we? The Henderson, Tennessee native had a solid rookie season in the league. He averaged 6.1 points and 14.8 minutes a game. Think that’s not very good? Put him in a starting role and have him play 36 minutes and his points bump up to 14.9 a game. His shooting percentages weren’t stupendous, but he proved that his stroke is gorgeous and I have complete faith in him to work on his game this offseason and make any small tweaks he thinks he needs. Speaking of this offseason, where does J-Lo go from here? I recently came across this brief piece from David Thorpe of ESPN.com an

Atlanta Hawks rookie Mike Scott was back home in Virginia on Saturday to visit his old high school and sign autographs at a Norfolk Foot Locker. While there, Scott talked about his transition to the NBA and admitted that it wasn't always a smooth ride. "At first you're thinking you'll play a lot, and you came from a college where you played a lot., you're the man, and actually that's not what it is," recalled Scott, "It's a big transition. You want to start over, take your time and basically learn your role." Scott also discussed his trip to the D-League and how at first a demotion to the NBA's minor league system can be seen as a negative by a player. "At first, I was like, 'Man, do they not think I can play?' But that was just the immaturity," Scott said, "(The D-league) was basically to get down there and get some playing time, have fun and play. "At the same time I went down there, I took care of business." By all accounts Scott was a class act during his rookie season and depending on what moves are made this offseason seems like a good bet to return to the Hawks next season. Currently his contract for next season is non-guaranteed. He averaged 4.6 points and 1.8 rebounds in 40 games with the Hawks in 2013. His quote about playing time provides a great insight into the thinking of a lot of players coming from college to the NBA. They are so used to playing and seeing things work out for them throughout high school and college that it is a bit of a jolt once they reach the NBA. That was where Scott's good work ethic appeared to pay off with the Hawks.

I discussed the Hawks upcoming offseason and the potential coaching and roster changes that could be on the horizon on the Mike Sammond show on 92.9 The Game. We discussed the coaching search, possible free agents, Jeff Teague and Josh Smith's future, and the possibilities of Dwight Howard and/or Chris Paul coming to Atlanta. You can listen here to my appearance here. Exit Question: What coach and free agents do you think will be/want to be on the Hawks' bench next season?

I just read an article that advocated it was time the Kings moved on from Cousins and his problems and traded him away. Do you think it is a worthwhile gamble to trade for Cousins? That would mean thinking that Atlanta can get beyond his attitude and behavior problems and that he is good enough to endure the risk that they may not. I'm not suggesting trading Al Horford, but I am suggesting both our 1st round picks in this year's draft. It's likely that those picks would have at least landed a prospect big. It is important to note that you'd have just 1 year of rookie contract time with DeMarcus before you'd have to decide whether he's worthy of a big contract. This is a hypothetical exercise. Don't get hung up if you think that the 2 mid-round firsts aren't enough to get the trade done. Just assume they are for the sake of this discussion. Also, what coaching hire would be best to get a talented, but messed up big guy to fly right and reach his potential? I just read an article that advocated it was time the Kings moved on from Cousins and his problems and traded him away. Do you think it is a worthwhile gamble to trade for Cousins? That would mean thinking that Atlanta can get beyond his attitude and behavior problems and that he is good enough to endure the risk that they may not. I'm not suggesting trading Al Horford, but I am suggesting both our 1st round picks in this year's draft. It's likely that those picks would have at least landed a prospect big. It is important to note that you'd have just 1 year of rookie contract time with DeMarcus before you'd have to decide whether he's worthy of a big contract. This is a hypothetical exercise. Don't get hung up if you think that the 2 mid-round firsts aren't enough to get the trade done. Just assume they are for the sake of this discussion. Also, what coaching hire would be best to get a talented, but messed up big guy to fly right and reach his potential?

Expectations By some accounts Anthony Tolliver was the last Hawk to make the opening day roster. Larry Drew preferred a more seasoned player to the likes of Damion James and James Anderson. Prior to signing with Atlanta, Anthony Tolliver courted a position with the Hawks via social media proclaiming that he would provide a dimension the Hawks lacked in the form of a stretch big. Beyond the long distance shooting touch expectation that he set himself, I think expectations were modest in that we expected a professional who would do whatever it took to stick with the club, but not really breakout. Looking at his last two seasons in Minnesota provided the wide contrast of what we might see from Anthony. In 2010-11 he was efficient and engaged shooting almost 41% from 3 point range. In 2011-12 you saw bad Anthony. He appeared in 14 less games and average 4 minutes per game less than the previous year as he never found his groove shooting less than 25% from 3 point range. We could hope for the best, but there was reason to fear that he couldn’t back up his shooting bravado. Results In spite of the appearance of being the last guy to make the team it was apparent that he wasn’t at the bottom of the depth chart as he started game 2 at PF for an injured Josh Smith. That injury start turned out to be a rare occurrence as Anthony didn’t get his second start until February. Over the course of the season Anthony was the professional we expected playing in 62 games and even starting 11 and filling whatever role was needed without any ruckus. The real measure though of his season would be the long distance shooting he promised and in this area he was okay, but not thrilling. A firm meh would be my grade. We didn’t see 41% Anthony, but thankfully we were spared 25% Anthony as well. He split the difference with just under 34% of his 3 pointers made. To put it in perspective of the Hawks to attempt 100 or more 3 pointers he ranked 6th in accuracy just ahead of Devin Harris (yes, Josh was a distant 8th if you were wondering). Highlight This one was pretty easy. I think it was shortly after his wife had given birth with what I think is their first child. The date was March 6th and Philadelphia was visiting the highlight factory. With 2 minutes left in the 1st Anthony Tolliver came in for Al Horford and he hit one basket before the quarter ended. In the 2nd quarter he really came alive hitting 4 more shots including 3 from deep and added a couple free throws to finish the half with 15 points. In his 5 years scrambling to stick in the league I’m not sure if Anthony has been the subject of many walk-off interviews, but he was on fire that night. He added 2 more 3 pointers in the second half and finished with 21 points (71.4% shooting from 3) and 8 rebounds. It was quite the game to celebrate being a proud poppa. Prognosis Personally I’m not opposed to his return. You need some solid vets off the bench who know how to play. I’m not sure he’ll get the opportunity though. When you analyze the production from the backup SF/PF spot on the roster without emotion I think you come away with the feeling that we are not getting consistent enough shooting and more importantly strong rebounding from the spot. There is definitely room for more production there. A lot of projecting who makes the bench depends on the coach's philosophy and what stage he sees the roster at. A coach secure in the idea of building a championship squad might try to develop a more talented youngster, while a coach fighting for survival likely would find comfort in a veteran like Tolliver being on the bench.

The Atlanta Hawks haven't yet declared that they are moving on from the Larry Drew era but the writing is clearly on the wall. Its so clear now that Drew will start entertaining offers from other teams including the Milwaukee Bucks with whom he will meet this weekend to discuss their head coaching vacancy. Danny Ferry is going through the process of interviewing others for the Hawks' head coaching position. Ferry hasn't yet ruled out Drew returning but Drew acknowledged on Friday to Atlanta Journal-Constitution columnist Jeff Schultz that it appears to be a longshot. "After talking with my adviser on this, he doesn't like the odds. I don't like the odds, either. That's why I've decided to move on with other organizations." Besides the Bucks, Drew has reportedly drawn interest from one other unnamed NBA team. Previously he had been linked to the Philadelphia 76ers opening. Drew and the Hawks exceded many of the media's expectations for the team this year but in the end that doesn't appear that it is going to be enough to save his job. He has amassed a 128-102 record in three seasons as the Hawks' head coach and led the team into the playoffs in all three seasons. However, Drew understands the situation and knows the transition phase that the franchise is going through under Ferry. "Realistically, I wasn't Danny's hire from Day 1," he said. "I was Rick Sund's hire. Danny just kind of inherited me. I totally respect the position he took. He wants to do his due diligence and make sure I'm the right guy for the job. Really, this whole year, I was basically interviewing for the job. At end of day, if it happens to evolve back to me, I will be his hire." Ferry hasn't set a timeframe for hiring a new coach. In the past it week it has been reported that he has met with Stan Van Gundy, Mike Budenholzer, Nate McMillan and CSKA Moscow head coach Ettore Messina.

Daniel Shirey – USA Today Sports Images Whenever you move out of a house, it’s a relatively complicated process that you have to go through. You have to pack up all of your things and be on your way to a better place. You always pack up your really nice things that you want to keep for a while. You might keep a fair amount of knick knacks that fill space. Inevitably, though, you are going to have to leave some things, as well. You might have to leave a couple of things that are really nice, but that you don’t really have any use for anymore. You might be glad to get rid of some things. Then there are those things that you could use if you had them, but you’re not exactly sure if you really need them; those are the most difficult things to make decisions about. The Atlanta Hawks are pretty much in the same situation as someone moving, because, basically, they are moving on from a place that they’ve been over the past few years in NBA. They are likely going to cut ties with their former star Josh Smith, who has been more of a burden, despite his skills, as of late. They are also likely going to re-sign Jeff Teague and build around him and Al Horford. Like with someone moving, though, their toughest decisions will be about the players that they could have a place for if they kept them, but that might not be the best option for the team as they head towards this new phase for the franchise. One of the more high-profile players that fits that bill is Devin Harris. Harris had a nice year with the Hawks, serving as both Teague’s backup and a secondary option at guard. He played 24.5 minutes per game in his 58 regular season appearances and averaged a solid 9.9 points, 3.4 assists, 1.1 steals and two rebounds per game while shooting 43.8 percent from the field. He wasn’t other-worldly, but he was definitely solid. However, Harris just turned 30 this past February, an age where a lot of players with as many years under their belt as Harris start to see decline in their skills and in their numbers. Harris may be a serviceable backup guard still, but he’s likely not going to bring any dynamic aspect to the table for much longer. Harris is an unrestricted free agent this summer and the Hawks have a big decision to make regarding him. Because of his age and potential to decline skill-wise, though, the Hawks should let him walk. Could he play solid minutes for them as a backup point guard next year: probably. However, they have younger options like Shelvin Mack with higher upside that they can keep that would likely be better for them. As they move on as a franchise, Harris is a player that the Hawks should decide to part ways with. Cody Williams is a Senior Writer with Rant Sports. Follow Cody on Twitter @TheSizzle20 and like his Facebook page.

As we get approach the 2013 NBA Draft, we are reaching out to local experts to help us scout some of the players the Hawks may take in the first round.  We had Anson Whaley from SB Nation Pittsburgh help us scout Pittsburgh center Steven Adams. What are his strengths? Weaknesses? Other than his athleticism for his height, Adams has three main strengths as I see them – his rebounding, defense, and ability to run up and down the floor. He was able to step in for Pitt as the starting center right away and rebounded and defended well. He even posted a couple of double-digit rebound games in the non-conference portion of the Panthers’ schedule. While the competition wasn’t the most difficult, he still had some impressive performances considering he wasn’t very used to the American style of basketball. Adams also runs the court incredibly well and has the ability to get out quickly on fast breaks and beat defenders for some easy transition baskets. The part of his game that needs the most work is his offense. Adams is very raw when it comes to the offensive end, and while he improved as the season went along, he still is without a consistent ‘go to’ move. Many times it was evident he was trying to think his way through what he wanted to do – it just hasn’t been fully natural to him yet. His hands and play around the basket could use work as well. Adams frustrated fans at times by trying to lay the ball in rather than dunk it while he was around the hoop. And to top it off, he is a poor free throw shooter and currently without much of a jump shot. His offense leaves quite a bit to be desired. What did he add to his team in college? What do you think he’ll bring to an NBA team? For Pitt, specifically, Adams gave the team a much-needed defensive presence inside. He rebounded well and averaged about two blocks a game while altering quite a few more. Adams clogged the lane and made guards think twice before coming inside. He won’t contribute much on offense right away in the NBA, and rebounding in the pros won’t be as easy as it was in college. But if nothing else, he should provide a solid presence in the paint from the time he steps on the court. And eventually, the rebounding and the offense will come. What kind of style is he best suited for? Adams is very athletic and in reasonably good shape, so a team that gets out and runs would be a good fit for him. Eventually he should adjust to the slower pace of a grind it out half-court set but he’s not there entirely right now. Adams is also a solid passer so an offense that thrives on ball movement would work as well. What sets him apart from other draft prospects at his position? At this stage, it’s his rare combination of height and agility. Adams is a very athletic player and while he isn’t as developed as many of the other players in the Draft, he has a world of potential. There just aren’t too many seven-footers that are as athletic as he is. What NBA player would you compare him to? I’ve been comparing him to the Spurs’ Tiago Splitter a lot. Splitter isn’t considered a star, but Adams has a long way just to catch up with him. He’s a big athletic center that has really come pretty far all things considered. I could see Adams developing into that type of player – athletic, high energy, and a very solid contributor. He’s not on Splitter’s level right now, but that’s the type of player I could envision him becoming. What’s your favorite memory of him at Pittsburgh? Probably seeing the growth he made by the end of the season when he started to come into his own. He rarely was dominant at Pitt, but by the time he played his last game in the NCAA Tournament against Wichita State, he had advanced significantly as a player. I remember watching him in the press area for both of Pitt’s preseason games against Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP) and Hawa